U.S. Sues ExxonMobil over Pegasus Pipeline Oil Spill

Today the United States and the state of Arkansas filed suit against ExxonMobil Pipeline Company and Mobil Pipe Line Company (owned by ExxonMobil) in federal district court in Little Rock, Arkansas because of the damages caused by the latest major oil spill.

The complaint covers ExxonMobil’s unlawful discharge of heavy crude oil from a 20-inch-diameter interstate pipeline – the Pegasus Pipeline – that ruptured in Mayflower, Arkansas on 29 March 2013. 

A segment of the Pegasus Pipeline ruptured two feet below the ground in a residential neighborhood in the town of Mayflower. The oil spilled directly into the neighborhood and then into nearby waterways, including a creek, wetlands, and Lake Conway.

Residents were forced to evacuate their homes due to the hazardous conditions in the neighborhood resulting from the spill. The oil has contaminated land and waterways and impacted human health and welfare, wildlife, and habitat. Cleanup efforts are still ongoing, ExxonMobil has taken a belligerent stances against media attempting to cover the environmental disaster, blocking access and threatening to have them arrested, and many residents still have not been able to return home.

The Pegasus Pipeline runs approximately 850 miles from Patoka, Illinois to Nederland, Texas, transporting Canadian heavy crude oil. The pipeline originally was constructed in the 1940s and capacity was increased 50% in 2009 to 30,000 barrels per day.

The complaint alleges six causes of action against the defendants. The United States, on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, seeks civil penalties and injunctive relief under the federal Clean Water Act for the oil spill. The state of Arkansas, on behalf of the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) by the authority of the Arkansas Attorney General, seeks civil penalties for violations of the Arkansas Hazardous Waste Management Act and the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act. The state also seeks a declaratory judgment on ExxonMobil’s liability for payment of removal costs and damages related to the spill pursuant to the federal Oil Pollution Act.

This entry was posted in energy, environment, litigation and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *