Federal Regs Work as Airlines Cut Delays and Cancellations

AutoInformed.com

DOT is now considering further refinements to consumer protections now in place.

The biggest airlines  in the U.S. had an on-time arrival record last December of 84.4%, the highest on-time percentage for any December during the 17 years the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has collected comparable flight delay data.  According to DOT’s Air Travel Consumer Report just released, the carriers also had a 0.8% rate of cancelled flights, the lowest December cancellation rate for the last 17 years. Airlines also reported no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights or more than four hours on international flights in December.

It is a clear example of the effectiveness and the need for government regulation of industry since airline passengers were not treated fairly or getting reliable transportation until DOT put in place regulations with stiff fines to stop all too common abuses. 

The larger U.S. airlines have been required to report long tarmac delays on their domestic flights since October 2008. Under a new rule that took effect in August of 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports.  Also beginning last August,  carriers operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than four hours. There is a separate three-hour limit on tarmac delays involving domestic flights, which went into effect in April 2010.

The full report is available at http://airconsumer.dot.gov/reports/index.htm.  Detailed information on flight delays is available at http://www.bts.gov.

See also:

This entry was posted in aviation, customer satisfaction, news, performance, transportation and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Federal Regs Work as Airlines Cut Delays and Cancellations

  1. Admin says:

    Fair point: In December, airlines said that 4.69% of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared to 4.90% in November; 5.19% by late-arriving aircraft, compared to 4.72% in November; 4.46% by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared to 3.97% in November; 0.33% by extreme weather, compared to 0.26% in November; and 0.03% for security reasons, equal to 0.03% in November.

    Weather is clearly a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.

  2. Scotty says:

    Methinks mild weather might have had an effect, too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *