-
Recent Posts
- Trump Tax Cuts for Rich among other things Wildly Unpopular
- World Endurance Championship – New Ferrari 499P
- Toyota Develops New 3rd Gen Fuel Cell System
- J.D. Power – Three Year Old Vehicle Problems Up
- Penske Automotive Group Posts Record Q4 Revenue of $7.7B
- Magna Expands Partnership with Mercedes-Benz
- U.S. EV Adoption to Stall in 2025
- Corvette ZR1 Sets Five Records on U.S. Track Tour
- Toyota Recalls 2024-2025 Tacoma Models for Bad Brakes
- First Look – New Volvo EX30 Cross Country
- Ford Recalls Expeditions, Super Dutys and Lincoln Corsairs
- MBUSA Recalling EQB models for Battery Fires
- Global Warming – U.S. Lags on EV Truck Battery Swapping
- Chevrolet Blazer EV SS to Pace Daytona 500 on Sunday
- NOAA – 2024 Was Earth’s Warmest Year on Record
Recent Comments
- US Auto Sales Forecast Trump Bump or Bumpy 25? | AutoInformed on Trump Presidency Effects on Auto Industry – All Bad?
- Lisa Jacobson on Fossil Fuel Phase Out or Cop Out at COP28?
- Stellantis on Carlos Tavares Out as Stellantis CEO
- NHTSA Fines Ford $165M for Flouting Recall Law | AutoInformed on Ford Recalls Defective Rear-view Cameras on 620,246 Vehicles
- Alfa Romeo Returns to Formula 1 in 2018 via Sauber on Alfa Romeo Returns to Formula 1 in 2018 via Sauber
Archives
Meta
IIHS Toughens Musts for Top Safety Pick Ratings
The biggest change to the criteria for both awards is the replacement of the original IIHS side crash test with the updated evaluation launched in 2021. The updated test involves 82% more energy than the original test. Vehicles must earn an acceptable or good rating to qualify for Top Safety Pick, while a good rating is required for the “plus.” Notably absent from the highest Plus rating are products from what were once called the Detroit Three makers thus far. Continue reading →