-
Recent Posts
- GM launches OnStar Fleet Intelligence Platform with AI
- New Vehicle Transaction Prices Continue to Soar in U.S.
- Two Time Indy 500 Winner Gordon Johncock dead at 90
- New 2027 VW ID. Tiguan Debuts in October
- Trump’s New Fuel Economy Standards Will Cost You ~$600!
- Rivian Automotive Recall for ~100,000 Bad Rearview Cameras
- Jaguar Land Rover Recall for Loss of Drive Power
- CARB Adopts Rules Supporting Use of E15 Gasoline
- Gasoline Prices Heading for New September Record!
- ACEA – Hybrids Top August EU Car Registrations
- Volkswagen Debuts In-Vehicle Gaming on Some 2027 Models
- By the Seat of Their Pants – Premium Seats Lag in Quality?
- September 2026 Light Vehicle Production Forecast So-So
- California Keeps Growing as It Cuts Climate Emissions Again
- Chrysler Recalls 97,349 Jeeps for Flying Roof Racks
Recent Comments
- NHTSA on Steering Loss – Ford Recalls F-Series Trucks
- AAA on AAA – August 20 Gasoline Prices Highest Ever!
- Nissan Motor on Nissan Posts ¥77.9B Profit in Q1 of Japanese Fiscal Year
- Jeff Badman on Ford Motor Recalls 850,000 Vehicles for Sudden Stalling
- Magna International on Magna International Posts Q1 2026 EPS Loss of $0.04
Archives
Meta
Get intelligent commentary on the automobile business and its economic and social effects. Stay informed with AutoInformed.
IIHS Toughens Musts for Top Safety Pick Ratings
The biggest change to the criteria for both awards is the replacement of the original IIHS side crash test with the updated evaluation launched in 2021. The updated test involves 82% more energy than the original test. Vehicles must earn an acceptable or good rating to qualify for Top Safety Pick, while a good rating is required for the “plus.” Notably absent from the highest Plus rating are products from what were once called the Detroit Three makers thus far. Continue reading →