-
Recent Posts
- U.S. Transportation Unemployment Tops U.S. Unemployment
- Toyota Motor Q2 FY 2027 Results – First Growth in Three Years!
- UAW Voters Persuasive in Trump Mid-Term Rout!
- Annals of Marketing – Dodge Returns to NASCAR
- Acura Begins U.S. Sales of NSX Reproduction Parts
- Lexus Recall for Instrument Panel Display Failures
- Audi to Build First American Plant in Georgia
- GM Q3 2026 Net $3.3B. More Share Buybacks Coming
- Toyota Installs Two Hydrogen Fueling Stations in Ontario CA
- WEC Barcelona – Toyota Racing Takes Manufacturers’ Title
- Park Outside! Genesis Recall for Power-Seat Motor Fires
- New UAW International Executive Board Sworn In
- First Look – Porsche Mission S Sports Car Concept Debut
- HondaJet APMG S Upgrade Approved by EASA
- Acura to Debut New SUVs Targeting Detroit Models
Recent Comments
- Governor Gretchen Whitmer on Trump Mis-Administration – Record High Gas Prices Persist
- NHTSA on Steering Loss – Ford Recalls F-Series Trucks
- AAA on AAA – August 20 Gasoline Prices Highest Ever!
- Nissan Motor on Nissan Posts ¥77.9B Profit in Q1 of Japanese Fiscal Year
- Jeff Badman on Ford Motor Recalls 850,000 Vehicles for Sudden Stalling
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: 1959 bel air
Web Wacko of the Month – Quicksilver Magazine on IIHS
A reader sent me a copy of Quicksilver, the magazine of the International Mercury Owners Assn., whose winter 2012 issue contains a piece by John Harvey claiming that the well publicized offset crash test between a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Bel Air was rigged. It is Harvey’s contention that the Bel Air did not have an engine in it when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crashed the disparate Chevys in a spectacular 40 mph impact. This is pure, unadulterated hooey. The Bel Air was in running condition, and the offset crash test was conducted in the presence of the news media. The Bel Air – its engine forced rearward into the occupant compartment, has been on display ever since at the IIHS Vehicle Research Center. Continue reading
