-
Recent Posts
- Annals of Marketing – Curated by Cadillac Escalade IQ
- Penske Automotive Group Take Private Proposal Advisors Set
- Alex Palou All But Assured of 2026 NTT IndyCar Series Title
- Seat Belt Recalls – Alfa Romeo Tonales and Dodge Hornets
- Ram 2019-26 Model-Year Seat-Belt Recall on ~1.3M!
- California Starts MyFirstEV Instant Rebate Program
- Brawley GTS ROVS Recalled for Sudden Acceleration
- Premium Vehicle Buyers Defecting to Mainstream Brands!
- Federal Offense! Higher Prices, Transportation Costs, and Other Economic Blows From King Trump Tariffs
- Subaru to Enter the ‘Captive Finance Business’ by 2030
- Goodyear Posts Q2 2026 Net Loss of $204 Million
- UAW Clout in Michigan Apparent in Primary Wins
- SMMT – Battery Electric Cars Sales Set Record in England!
- General Motors and Chinese SAIC Motor Lengthen JV to 2047!
- Center for Automotive Research on “China Speed”
Recent Comments
- Nissan Motor on Nissan Posts ¥77.9B Profit in Q1 of Japanese Fiscal Year
- Jeff Badman on Ford Motor Recalls 850,000 Vehicles for Sudden Stalling
- Magna International on Magna International Posts Q1 2026 EPS Loss of $0.04
- Council on Foreign Relations on Iran and Strait of Hormuz on AAA – Pump Gasoline Prices Still Soaring
- Autocrat on Stellantis Subordinated Perpetual Hybrid Bonds on Stellantis Posts Full Year 2025 Loss of €22.3B
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: National Academy of Sciences
US Should Cautiously Track Solar GeoEngineering Research to Mitigate Climate Change – National Academies of Sciences
“Scientific understanding of many aspects of Solar GeoEngineering technologies remains limited, including how they could affect weather extremes, agriculture, natural ecosystems, or human health,” the report said. Continue reading

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Refute Climate Change Deny-ers
A new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine says the evidence for current and future harm to human health and welfare created by human-caused greenhouse gases is beyond scientific dispute.*
“This study was undertaken with the ultimate aim of informing the EPA, following its call for public comments, as it considers the status of the endangerment finding,” said Shirley Tilghman, professor of molecular biology and public affairs, emeritus, and former president, Princeton University, and chair of the committee that wrote the report. “We are hopeful that the evidence summarized here shows the strong base of scientific evidence available to inform sound decision-making. Continue reading →