-
Recent Posts
- GM to Layoff 500 Employees at Oshawa Assembly
- GM Spending $30M at Fairfax to Flex EV and ICE Making
- First Look – Genesis X Skorpio Concept
- Porsche Head of Design – Sühlmann Succeeds Mauer
- GM Posts 2025 Net of $12.7B on $185B Revenue
- EVs Outsell Internal Combustion Vehicles in EU!
- Volvo Car Financial Services Extends BoA Deal
- Tesla, Toyota Top Power 2026 U.S. ALG Residual Value Awards
- Fire Risk – Ford Recalls Escape, Explorer, Focus, MKC Models
- Pessimism on the Economy – A Pox on Both Parties
- Nissan Sells South African Plants to Chery SA
- January 2026 U.S. Auto Sales Forecast Down
- FDIC Conditionally Approves Ford Credit Industrial Bank
- First Look – 2026 Mercedes-AMG F1 W17 Racer
- Volvo EX60 Mid-Size SUV Debuts
Recent Comments
- UAW Ford Department Director VP Laura Dickerson on Trump's Ford Plant Visit on Whitmer Stands in Stark Contrast to Trump at Detroit Auto Show
- Ken Zino on Ford Fuel Injector Leak Recall Now at ~694,000
- Laverne Oliver on Ford Fuel Injector Leak Recall Now at ~694,000
- Magna on its Share Repurchase Plan in reference to on Magna Posts Solid Q3 2025 Earnings Gain
- Daniel Ricciardo Global Ford Racing Ambassador on Ford Performance Rebranded as Ford Racing
Archives
Meta

Black versus White Hat Cyber Attacks on Your Vehicle
While White hat attacks may uncover significant vulnerabilities that should be calls for action, research-based attacks do not have malicious intent, according to Upstream Security. White hat attacks can cause financial damage or problems for a brand. However, it’s claimed by those doing them for sales purposes, that for many companies, the warnings they receive from researchers or even technologically capable consumers are helpful to their security optimization and improvement. Continue reading →