-
Recent Posts
- Genesis Recall for Sudden Unintended Braking
- Road Hazard – Ford Escape Liftgate Hinge Cover Recall
- Lando Norris Wins Formula One World Drivers’ Championship
- Stellantis Shows Two Autonomous Driving Vehicles
- Lotus Esprit Refresh offered by Encor
- Japanese Top Consumer Reports 2026 Automotive Report
- Trump Mis-Administration Proposes a Weaker CAFE
- Toyota 2026 Mirai – Cordless EV with 402 Mile Range
- Subaru of America November Sales Drop 10%
- American Honda Posts November Sales of 102,824
- BMW Group Increases Its CO2 Reduction Goals
- Hyundai Santa Fe Recall for Bad Rear-View Cameras
- F1 Driver’s Championship Goes Down to Last Race
- Visit Qatar to Be Principal Partner of Audi F1 Team
- New Mercedes-Benz Electric CLA to start at $47,250
Recent Comments
- Magna on its Share Repurchase Plan in reference to on Magna Posts Solid Q3 2025 Earnings Gain
- Daniel Ricciardo Global Ford Racing Ambassador on Ford Performance Rebranded as Ford Racing
- Gen 3 2026 Nissan Leaf Less than $30,000? | AutoInformed on Milestones – Nissan Begins Assembly of 2013 LEAF EV in Tennessee
- ACSI – Customer Satisfaction with Autos Dropping | AutoInformed on New DOGE Scorecard Announced to Track Trump
- Cadillac Off-Roader – Elevated Velocity | AutoInformed on Annals of Marketing – Cadillac Opulent Velocity Concept EV
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: Center for Auto Safety
Do No Harm – Center for Auto Safety Drafts AV Bill of Rights
Simply put the draft – covering a wide and formidable list of potential issues – says AVs should “Do no harm!” The draft is an ambitious attempt to learn from the more than a century of automobility and apply the knowledge at the outset of what is expected to be widespread AV use sometime in the, oh, next decade or three. Continue reading
Consumer Rights Nil in New Autonomous Vehicle Bills?
The Center for Auto Safety says one of the proposals, the SELF DRIVE Act, “neglects to include any consumer protections that prevent the use of binding arbitration clauses in contracts involving autonomous vehicles.” As is common in Washington the legislation is misleadingly named. However, there is a need to explore the issue as there are arguments on many aspects of technology and systems that can save lives and reduce traffic congestion even though AutoInformed remains skeptical about the ability of politicians to do so with a regard for We the People as opposed to We the Congress who are paid large sums by corporate interests. Continue reading →