-
Recent Posts
- Annals of Marketing – LEXUS Flight Helicopter Service Debuts
- Magna International Posts Record Q2 Earnings per Share
- IIHS – Driver Death Rates and Vehicles That Kill other Drivers
- Stellantis Posts a Modest Q2 2026 Net Profit of €0.3 Billion
- Penske Automotive Group Posts Q2 2026 Earnings Decline
- Ford Motor Posts Q2 2026 Net Loss of $1.3B
- Magna to Supply Chery with 800V 2-Speed eDrive
- Bosch Fuel-Cell System Begins Testing in Madrid
- Stellantis Sells Free2move to a Private Equity Firm
- CAR on King Trump’s Tariff and Trade Policies
- Non-Binding ‘cellcentric’ Fuel Cell Agreement Moves Ahead
- Ford Motor Recalls ~566,000 Broncos for Wiring Harness Fires
- Autokiniton Workers in Milan, Michigan Vote to Join the UAW
- Financing Costs Ease a Tad But Payments Set July Record
- EPA Certifies Higher Estimated Range for 2027 Volvo EX60
Recent Comments
- Jeff Badman on Ford Motor Recalls 850,000 Vehicles for Sudden Stalling
- Magna International on Magna International Posts Q1 2026 EPS Loss of $0.04
- Council on Foreign Relations on Iran and Strait of Hormuz on AAA – Pump Gasoline Prices Still Soaring
- Autocrat on Stellantis Subordinated Perpetual Hybrid Bonds on Stellantis Posts Full Year 2025 Loss of €22.3B
- Michigan Governor Whitmer on Pew – Confidence in Trump Dips, Fewer Support His Policies
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: Center for Auto Safety
Do No Harm – Center for Auto Safety Drafts AV Bill of Rights
Simply put the draft – covering a wide and formidable list of potential issues – says AVs should “Do no harm!” The draft is an ambitious attempt to learn from the more than a century of automobility and apply the knowledge at the outset of what is expected to be widespread AV use sometime in the, oh, next decade or three. Continue reading
Consumer Rights Nil in New Autonomous Vehicle Bills?
The Center for Auto Safety says one of the proposals, the SELF DRIVE Act, “neglects to include any consumer protections that prevent the use of binding arbitration clauses in contracts involving autonomous vehicles.” As is common in Washington the legislation is misleadingly named. However, there is a need to explore the issue as there are arguments on many aspects of technology and systems that can save lives and reduce traffic congestion even though AutoInformed remains skeptical about the ability of politicians to do so with a regard for We the People as opposed to We the Congress who are paid large sums by corporate interests. Continue reading →